The Malaise That's Tushar Mehta
«Ranjit Kumar: People are coming in an influx. Same people on both side - same people on border - I've shown the UN doc on drugs and crime and Myanmar govt doc. Why is all this happening?
«CJI DY Chandrachud: But those raped and murdered are our people right? So we need to make this right.
«SG Mehta: Most of the unclaimed bodies are those of the infiltrators who came with certain agenda...
«Colin Gonsalves: Compensation scheme is there but there has been no compensation provided.
«Jaideep Gupta: I hope that it is not being suggested to give compensation to infiltrators.»
See also: https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/manipur-violence-case-live-updates-from-supreme-court-234088
AND
Tushar Mehta, "Solicitor General of India" (SGI), and Advocates Jaideep Gupta & Ranjit Kumar, told the Supreme Court of India (@SCofInd) that bodies of Kukis in Imphal Hospital Morgues are "bodies of illegal infiltrators with an agenda."
"Infiltrator" is a more serious allegation than merely alleging that one is an "illegal immigrant."
To allege that one is an "infiltrator with an agenda" is a further grave aggravation of his (Tushar Mehta's) crimes and offences.
In fact, this statement commits the Crimes and Offences of Contempt of Court, Sedition, Waging War against India and her citizens, and other crimes, no more, no less.
The SGI is the spokesman of Central Government to the highest judiciary, a very important position.
When he speaks, he's not a free man, speaking his mind, he's only a glorified ventriloquist's dummy for the ruling power, at this time, Narendra Modi.
Why did the Supreme Court of India not initiate Suo Moto Contempt of Court, Sedition, High Treason in this Extremely Serious Matter?
Does it not know the Law?
Or is it Complicit in this?
Tushar Mehta has called, among others, the man and son, who was the husband, father, and brother of the mother & daughter who were paraded naked, groped, gangraped, as "illegal infiltrators with an agenda."
That includes, by extension, the two women, out of the three, rape victims.
Also pay attention to the context of these statements by Tushar Mehta and Advocate Jaideep Gupta: Their statements were made in context of the mother & daughter duo that had been kidnapped by the Meitei Police acting under "Color of law" and handed over to the Mob of Meitei Terrorists, who murdered the man and his son, stripped, paraded, groped, gangraped these women, these same two women were intervening in the Kukis' Petition in the Supreme Court of India, requesting justice, recovery of the bodies of the two murder victims, compensations, and other reliefs!
Thus these statements, by Tushar Mehta and Jaideep Gupta, were deliberately and consciously made, to insult and aggravate the crimes of murder & rape against these victims, to outrage their modesties, to belittle them.
These statements were made with the authority of the Central Government of India, with the authority of the "Prime Minister" Narendra Modi, who, it must be naturally assumed, briefed & authorized the SGI to adopt & push these malicious and conscious lies of the unconstitutional, illegal , null and void N. Biren Singh "Manipur Administration."
These statements are extremely serious offences under Indian Anti-Rape laws.
I am fully aware that Mr. Tushar Mehta, and Adv. Jaideep Gupta, were speaking "on brief" for "Manipur Government."
That is absolutely ZERO excuse.
It does not Separate, and Distinguish between him as SGI & as a Private Citizen.
As a matter of fact, he was speaking "in both capacities," speaking "for both," the Government of India (GoI) and for the "Manipur Government," because he was "on loan," authorized by GoI.
Also, because the GoI is kept "in the loop" because the "rules of engagement" does not allow the SGI to speak as a "free citizen," but only in THE STRICTEST CONFORMITY with the GoI.
Therefore, Tushar Mehta's statement is utterly inexcusable.
Therefore, Tushar Mehta was speaking as much for Narendra Modi as for "Chief Minister" Biren Singh.
I am fully aware that the SGI, as an "officer of the Court" cannot be prosecuted by ordinary citizens, without consent of the GoI. However, the Supreme Court of India does have this power to prosecute him, punish him for these extremely serious offences, crimes.
His Statement is also a grave offence under the "Prevention of Atrocities Act," constitutes Contempt of Court, Sedition, High Treason, among other crimes.
His statement constitutes a number of very serious offences, requiring Severe, Exemplary & Salutary Punishment.
Anybody still laboring under delusion that Modi's silent on the "#ManipurHorror"?
WHAT IS THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA DOING?
In the case of "Vishakha Guidelines," an appeal had been made from the acquittal of the rape-accused, by the Rajasthan High Court, to the Supreme Court of India.
Even before the Supreme Court of India could hear that appeal, even before it could go into the facts and merits of the case, the Supreme Court of India invoked it's right to "legislate extraordinarily," to constitute the falsely so-called "Vishakha Guidelines."
I carefully chose my words, in saying, "falsely so-called," because, without hearing the case, going into the facts, a judge or court presuming that one party is "guilty," is a grave and presumptuous violation of the law, a crime called "Prejudice," which is a Grave Crime when committed by persons in Authority, worse when perpetrated by judges, absolutely monstrous when perpetrated by the Highest Court of the land, from which there is no further appeal.
Open and blatant Prejudice by a Court nullifies its actions, renders them null and void, disqualifies those judges from judging the matter. Any pretended judgement despite, is called the crime of "Color of law." Or, sort of dissimulation.
The validity or otherwise, of the "Vishakha Guidelines," is incidental to this article.
What is important, is that the Supreme Court of India invoked it's right to "extraordinarily legislate" the falsely so-called"Vishakha Guidelines." This "extraordinary power to legislate" is recognized worldwide as a power vesting in Courts of Law. Ordinarily, Courts do not legislate.
Again, I mention this because India is faced with a Collapse of the Constitutional Order, not merely restricted to the erstwhile "State of Manipur," (which constitutionally ceased to exist "latae sententiae" due to the criminal and anticonstitutional acts of the erstwhile "Government of Manipur" and it's erstwhile "Chief Minister" N. Biren Singh) but extending to the Government of India which is culpable even if by mere negligence (It's not negligent, it's in lockstep with, and authorizes, and illegally, criminally, and anticonstitutionally, "legitimates" the erstwhile "Government of Manipur," and the erstwhile "Chief Minister" N. Biren Singh), so that the Supreme Court of India, as a Responsible Body has the Urgent and Inescapable Duty of taking up the governance of "Manipur" which has De Facto lapsed into the State of being a "Union Territory," a duty to make up for the Grave Lacunae of the "Central Government of India" in being Complicit with the Anticonstitutional acts of the now De Facto illegal and Terrorist "Government of Manipur" which presides over, manages and enforces, the "State" Genocide of the Kukis, with the blessings of the "Government of India," as made apparent by Tushar Mehta, under Color of Law.
As the Supreme Court of Law in India, the Supreme Court of India cannot be ignorant and unaware of these facts, and of it's duties under the Indian Constitution and under the Legal Principle of Epikeia or Equity, and under International Laws and Conventions, including the Nuremberg Principles.
It is able to intervene, to remove the charade of the N. Biren Singh regime being anymore the legitimate government of "Manipur," and given the fact of the Genocide of the Kukis, and of the ongoing attempts by the illegal N. Biren Singh "regime" to expand the Genocide into a Holocaust, it is also able to legislate under Article 3 of the Indian Constitution, to separate Kukiland, or North Mizoram, and South Nagaland, from Meiteiland, and constitute these territories into an interim 2, of PatkaiBum Mountains Union Territory temporarily shared by Nagas and Kukis, and in finality, three separate Political Administrations, of Southern Nagaland, of Meiteiland or Kangleipak, and of Kukiland or Northern Mizoram, and also to act to disband the "Manipur Police," and "Manipur Rifles," and to outlaw the Meira Paibis, UMO, Imas, AMUCO, Arambai Tenggol Meitei Leepun, and other actor-perpetrators of the Kuki Genocide.
To be honest, the Supreme Court of India is the last recourse for a pacification of "Manipur."
However, again to be honest, I have zero confidence that it will rise up to do the right thing, and end the Homicidal and Genocidal madness of the Meiteis.
Lucio Mascarenhas
